Protest 692355-G of Caradine Hat Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 692355-G of Caradine Hat Co.

9 Cust. Ct. 453

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 30, 1942

DocketNo. 47759

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Cust. Ct. 453 (Protest 692355-G of Caradine Hat Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 692355-G of Caradine Hat Co., 9 Cust. Ct. 453 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the merchandise ip. question consists of “8-Bu. paper hats” the same as those involved in Caradine v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). In accordance therewith some were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and those imported subsequent to the effective date of the trade agreement with the Netherlands (T. D. 48075) were held dutiable at 12}! percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), as modified by T. D. 48075.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the merchandise ip. question consists of “8-Bu. paper hats” the same as those involved in Caradine v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). In accordance therewith some were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and those imported subsequent to the effective date of the trade agreement with the Netherlands (T. D. 48075) were held dutiable at 12}! percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), as modified by T. D. 48075.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Cust. Ct. 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-692355-g-of-caradine-hat-co-cusc-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack