Protest 69031-K of Railway Express Agency, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 69031-K of Railway Express Agency, Inc.

13 Cust. Ct. 321

United States Customs Court·Decided December 7, 1944·No. No. 49851·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Walker, J.

When the case was called for trial it was submitted without the introduction of. any evidence. From the official papers, including the entries, invoices, etc., it appeared'that the claim of the plaintiff is well founded. The collector was therefore directed to reliquidate the entries, taking duty on the net quantity of lumber imported, citing Seaboard Lumber Sales Co. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Walker, J.

When the case was called for trial it was submitted without the introduction of. any evidence. From the official papers, including the entries, invoices, etc., it appeared'that the claim of the plaintiff is well founded. The collector was therefore directed to reliquidate the entries, taking duty on the net quantity of lumber imported, citing Seaboard Lumber Sales Co. v. United States (5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391).

Protest 69031-K of Railway Express Agency, Inc., 13 Cust. Ct. 321 (cusc 1944).

Pincite

13 Cust. Ct. 321 (Protest 69031-K of Railway Express Agency, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related