Protest 689581-G of Langfelder

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 689581-G of Langfelder

3 Cust. Ct. 376

United States Customs Court·Decided September 6, 1939·No. No. 42059·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel beach balls identical with those the subject of United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770), footballs of the Rugby type, similar to those the subject of Abstract 27179, and tennis rackets like those passed upon in May v. United States (T. D. 47760) and Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1502 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel beach balls identical with those the subject of United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770), footballs of the Rugby type, similar to those the subject of Abstract 27179, and tennis rackets like those passed upon in May v. United States (T. D. 47760) and Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1502 as claimed.

Protest 689581-G of Langfelder, 3 Cust. Ct. 376 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 376 (Protest 689581-G of Langfelder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.