Protest 687681-G of Lisk

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 687681-G of Lisk

1 Cust. Ct. 447

United States Customs Court·Decided October 18, 1938·No. No. 39640·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that certain items consist.of unin-flated rubber balls the same as those the subject of Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48231) and United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770). [448] The claim at 30 percent under paragraph 1502 was therefore sustained. Novelties composed in chief value of rubber similar to those the subject of Abstract 25607 were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Sullivan, J.

It was stipulated that certain items consist.of unin-flated rubber balls the same as those the subject of Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48231) and United States v. Woolworth (24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770). [448] The claim at 30 percent under paragraph 1502 was therefore sustained. Novelties composed in chief value of rubber similar to those the subject of Abstract 25607 were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b).

Protest 687681-G of Lisk, 1 Cust. Ct. 447 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 447 (Protest 687681-G of Lisk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.