Protest 677453-G of Farmers Produce Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 677453-G of Farmers Produce Co.

4 Cust. Ct. 518

United States Customs Court·Decided June 7, 1940·No. No. 43894·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Nothing was offered tending to show that the plaintiff submitted to the collector evidence other than the notices of condemnation together with the condemnation certificates. It was held that they failed to meet the evidence submitted by the Government, which, on the record presented, indicated that the collector acted lawfully in denying the importer’s claim for refund of duty on the condemned tomatoes. The protest was therefore overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Nothing was offered tending to show that the plaintiff submitted to the collector evidence other than the notices of condemnation together with the condemnation certificates. It was held that they failed to meet the evidence submitted by the Government, which, on the record presented, indicated that the collector acted lawfully in denying the importer’s claim for refund of duty on the condemned tomatoes. The protest was therefore overruled.

Protest 677453-G of Farmers Produce Co., 4 Cust. Ct. 518 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 518 (Protest 677453-G of Farmers Produce Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.