Protest 676804-G of Jacobsen & Kupitsky

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 676804-G of Jacobsen & Kupitsky

15 Cust. Ct. 350

United States Customs Court·Decided December 7, 1945·No. No. 50753·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of dogskins similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Arnhold & Co., Inc. (27 C. C. P. A. 135, C. A. D. 74), and that other items consist of goatskins the same as those involved in United States v. Winograd Bros., Inc. (32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302). In accordance therewith the claim for freejentry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of dogskins similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Arnhold & Co., Inc. (27 C. C. P. A. 135, C. A. D. 74), and that other items consist of goatskins the same as those involved in United States v. Winograd Bros., Inc. (32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302). In accordance therewith the claim for freejentry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Protest 676804-G of Jacobsen & Kupitsky, 15 Cust. Ct. 350 (cusc 1945).

Pincite

15 Cust. Ct. 350 (Protest 676804-G of Jacobsen & Kupitsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.