Protest 676804-G of Jacobsen & Kupitsky

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 676804-G of Jacobsen & Kupitsky

15 Cust. Ct. 350

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 7, 1945

DocketNo. 50753

StatusPublished

This text of 15 Cust. Ct. 350 (Protest 676804-G of Jacobsen & Kupitsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 676804-G of Jacobsen & Kupitsky, 15 Cust. Ct. 350 (cusc 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of dogskins similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Arnhold & Co., Inc. (27 C. C. P. A. 135, C. A. D. 74), and that other items consist of goatskins the same as those involved in United States v. Winograd Bros., Inc. (32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302). In accordance therewith the claim for freejentry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of dogskins similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. Arnhold & Co., Inc. (27 C. C. P. A. 135, C. A. D. 74), and that other items consist of goatskins the same as those involved in United States v. Winograd Bros., Inc. (32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302). In accordance therewith the claim for freejentry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Cust. Ct. 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-676804-g-of-jacobsen-kupitsky-cusc-1945.