Protest 635324-G of C. S. Emery & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 635324-G of C. S. Emery & Co.

3 Cust. Ct. 325

United States Customs Court·Decided July 5, 1939·No. No. 41797·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Emery v. United States (T. D. 46702) and Myers v. United States (T. D. 49530) it was held that the clapboards in question should have been assessed on the number of board feet found by taking the mean average of the thickness of the edges without deduction for planing under paragraph 401 and section 601 (c) (6), Revenue Act of 1932.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

McClelland, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Emery v. United States (T. D. 46702) and Myers v. United States (T. D. 49530) it was held that the clapboards in question should have been assessed on the number of board feet found by taking the mean average of the thickness of the edges without deduction for planing under paragraph 401 and section 601 (c) (6), Revenue Act of 1932.

Protest 635324-G of C. S. Emery & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 325 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 325 (Protest 635324-G of C. S. Emery & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.