Protest 63022-K of A. Schmidt & Sons
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in John Barr v. United States (11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See John Barr v. United States, 324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
15 Cust. Ct. 309 (Protest 63022-K of A. Schmidt & Sons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.