Protest 625424-G of Irving L. Hartmann & Co.

11 Cust. Ct. 316
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedDecember 8, 1943
DocketNo. 49012
StatusPublished

This text of 11 Cust. Ct. 316 (Protest 625424-G of Irving L. Hartmann & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protest 625424-G of Irving L. Hartmann & Co., 11 Cust. Ct. 316 (cusc 1943).

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the items are hats similar in all material respects to those involved in Caradine v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In .accordance therewith those imported or withdrawn for consumption prior to .February 1, 1936, were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and those imported or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to said date were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and T. D. 48075. Protest sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caradine Hat Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 69 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Cust. Ct. 316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-625424-g-of-irving-l-hartmann-co-cusc-1943.