Protest 625424-G of Irving L. Hartmann & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 625424-G of Irving L. Hartmann & Co.

11 Cust. Ct. 316

United States Customs Court·Decided December 8, 1943·No. No. 49012·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the items are hats similar in all material respects to those involved in Caradine v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In .accordance therewith those imported or withdrawn for consumption prior to .February 1, 1936, were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and those imported or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to said date were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and T. D. 48075. Protest sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the items are hats similar in all material respects to those involved in Caradine v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In .accordance therewith those imported or withdrawn for consumption prior to .February 1, 1936, were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and those imported or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to said date were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and T. D. 48075. Protest sustained to this extent.

Protest 625424-G of Irving L. Hartmann & Co., 11 Cust. Ct. 316 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

11 Cust. Ct. 316 (Protest 625424-G of Irving L. Hartmann & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related