Protest 618980-G of Moscahlades Bros., Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 618980-G of Moscahlades Bros., Inc.

1 Cust. Ct. 360

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 29, 1938

DocketNo. 39125

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cust. Ct. 360 (Protest 618980-G of Moscahlades Bros., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 618980-G of Moscahlades Bros., Inc., 1 Cust. Ct. 360 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

[361]*361Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It appeared that the fluid in which the olives were packed is used only as a preservative and is discarded when the olives are removed from the containers. On the authority of Von Bremen v. United States (T. D. 46643) and Lippincott v. United States (11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 29, T. D. 38646) it was held that the olives in question are dutiable on the invoice net weight exclusive of the oil and vinegar in which they are packed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[361]*361Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It appeared that the fluid in which the olives were packed is used only as a preservative and is discarded when the olives are removed from the containers. On the authority of Von Bremen v. United States (T. D. 46643) and Lippincott v. United States (11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 29, T. D. 38646) it was held that the olives in question are dutiable on the invoice net weight exclusive of the oil and vinegar in which they are packed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Cust. Ct. 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-618980-g-of-moscahlades-bros-inc-cusc-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack