Protest 616930-G of New York Merchandise Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 616930-G of New York Merchandise Co.

7 Cust. Ct. 278

United States Customs Court·Decided October 1, 1941·No. No. 46387·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the tennis rackets in question are similar to those the subject of May v. United States (T. D. 47760) and Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) the claim at 30 percent under paragraph 1502 was sustained. Rubber mice in part of bamboo stipulated to be similar to those the subject of Abstract 40389 were held dutiable, [279]*279■as claimed, as articles wholly or in part of bamboo, not specially provided for, at 45 percent under paragraph 409.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the tennis rackets in question are similar to those the subject of May v. United States (T. D. 47760) and Woolworth v. United States (T. D. 48573) the claim at 30 percent under paragraph 1502 was sustained. Rubber mice in part of bamboo stipulated to be similar to those the subject of Abstract 40389 were held dutiable, [279]*279■as claimed, as articles wholly or in part of bamboo, not specially provided for, at 45 percent under paragraph 409.

Protest 616930-G of New York Merchandise Co., 7 Cust. Ct. 278 (cusc 1941).

Pincite

7 Cust. Ct. 278 (Protest 616930-G of New York Merchandise Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.