Protest 5939-K of Butler Bros.
6 Cust. Ct. 538
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Butler v. United States (4 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 303) the Rockingham ware in question was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 5939-K of Butler Bros., 6 Cust. Ct. 538 (cusc 1941).
6 Cust. Ct. 538 (Protest 5939-K of Butler Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Butler Bros. v. United States
4 Cust. Ct. 120 (U.S. Customs Court, 1940)