Protest 587958-G of Strohmeyer & Arpe Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 587958-G of Strohmeyer & Arpe Co.

2 Cust. Ct. 781

United States Customs Court·Decided June 27, 1939·No. No. 41737·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was established that the merchandise is used as an ingredient in drinks and also as a cordial. The appraiser reported that the merchandise consists of beverages containing less than one-half of 1 percent of alcohol. Following the principle announced in Tonkin v. United States (T. D. 46491) and Abstract 27726 the court held that the commodities in question are not included within the meaning of the term “beverages” in paragraph 808 and overruled the protest. Abstract 33146 distinguished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was established that the merchandise is used as an ingredient in drinks and also as a cordial. The appraiser reported that the merchandise consists of beverages containing less than one-half of 1 percent of alcohol. Following the principle announced in Tonkin v. United States (T. D. 46491) and Abstract 27726 the court held that the commodities in question are not included within the meaning of the term “beverages” in paragraph 808 and overruled the protest. Abstract 33146 distinguished.

Protest 587958-G of Strohmeyer & Arpe Co., 2 Cust. Ct. 781 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 781 (Protest 587958-G of Strohmeyer & Arpe Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.