Protest 557061-G of Fujii Junichi Shoten, Ltd.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 557061-G of Fujii Junichi Shoten, Ltd.

17 Cust. Ct. 217

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 13, 1946

DocketNo. 51405

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Cust. Ct. 217 (Protest 557061-G of Fujii Junichi Shoten, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 557061-G of Fujii Junichi Shoten, Ltd., 17 Cust. Ct. 217 (cusc 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was conceded that the fish is identical in all material respects with that passed upon in United States v. Enbun (19 C. C. P. A. 79, T. D. 45224) wherein the merchandise was found to be “dried, unsalted fish, known as bonita, which had been shaved or shredded,” the court concluding that “the language ‘dried fish’ is more specific than the general language fish ‘otherwise prepared or preserved’.” Following the statutory construction applied in the cited ease, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was conceded that the fish is identical in all material respects with that passed upon in United States v. Enbun (19 C. C. P. A. 79, T. D. 45224) wherein the merchandise was found to be “dried, unsalted fish, known as bonita, which had been shaved or shredded,” the court concluding that “the language ‘dried fish’ is more specific than the general language fish ‘otherwise prepared or preserved’.” Following the statutory construction applied in the cited ease, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 Cust. Ct. 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-557061-g-of-fujii-junichi-shoten-ltd-cusc-1946.