Protest 554985-G of Tientsin Trading Corp.
10 Cust. Ct. 387
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the hats in question are similar to those involved in Caradine v. United States (9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664) some of them were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and others entered or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to the effective date of the Netherlands Trade Agreement (T. D. 48075) were held dutiable at 12% percent under said paragraph 1504 (b) (5).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 554985-G of Tientsin Trading Corp., 10 Cust. Ct. 387 (cusc 1943).
10 Cust. Ct. 387 (Protest 554985-G of Tientsin Trading Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caradine Hat Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 69 (U.S. Customs Court, 1942)