Protest 5413-K of A. L. Salomon & Co.
This text of 5 Cust. Ct. 395 (Protest 5413-K of A. L. Salomon & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
There was testimony that the article is used for perforating papers so that they may be placed in a so-called “Shannon” file. On the authority of Abstract 17431 the perforators in question were held not to be machines within the meaning of paragraph 372 and the protest was overruled. Abstracts 10088 and 29236 cited. Simon v. United States (8 Ct. Cust. Appls. 273, T. D. 37537) and Abstract 3762 distinguished.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Cust. Ct. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-5413-k-of-a-l-salomon-co-cusc-1940.