Protest 5413-K of A. L. Salomon & Co.

5 Cust. Ct. 395
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedNovember 14, 1940
DocketNo. 44729
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 Cust. Ct. 395 (Protest 5413-K of A. L. Salomon & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protest 5413-K of A. L. Salomon & Co., 5 Cust. Ct. 395 (cusc 1940).

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

There was testimony that the article is used for perforating papers so that they may be placed in a so-called “Shannon” file. On the authority of Abstract 17431 the perforators in question were held not to be machines within the meaning of paragraph 372 and the protest was overruled. Abstracts 10088 and 29236 cited. Simon v. United States (8 Ct. Cust. Appls. 273, T. D. 37537) and Abstract 3762 distinguished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Idl Mfg. & Sales Corp.
48 C.C.P.A. 17 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1960)
IDL Mfg. & Sales Corp. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 13 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Cust. Ct. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-5413-k-of-a-l-salomon-co-cusc-1940.