Protest 52571-K of Suen Mark & Co.

12 Cust. Ct. 287

Opinion

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was assessed and claimed dutiable at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in Quong Yuen Shing Co. v. United States (31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the gourmet powder or ve-tsin at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5 (chemical compounds). The protest was sustained.