Protest 50257-K of Howatt Brokerage Co.
This text of 9 Cust. Ct. 386 (Protest 50257-K of Howatt Brokerage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
No testimony was produced in support of the plaintiff’s claim. The attorney for the plaintiff at the hearing set forth his interpretation of the official papers including the invoice and entry and cited in support of plaintiff’s claim Abstract 45375, stating that case had been decided on rehearing. The case, however, has not as yet been decided. Parodi v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 95, C. D. 436) was also cited but there -was no proof in the record that the merchandise in the instant case is the same as that in the cited case. On the record as presented the protest was overruled for lack of proof of the facts therein alleged, following Abstract 38965.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Cust. Ct. 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-50257-k-of-howatt-brokerage-co-cusc-1942.