Protest 44218-K of Nathan

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 44218-K of Nathan

8 Cust. Ct. 520

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 15, 1942

DocketNo. 47195

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Cust. Ct. 520 (Protest 44218-K of Nathan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 44218-K of Nathan, 8 Cust. Ct. 520 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the plaintiff limited his claims to certain articles. He testified that one of the articles, binoculars, had been in his possession 6 years prior to his immigrating to this country and that the remaining articles had been in his household for more than a year prior to departure. However, from the evidence presented the court was unable to determine which of the household effects, if any, are entitled to free entry under paragraph 1632. /The binoculars were not shown to be household effects, nor to be exempt from duty under paragraph 1798. On the record presented the protest was overruled in all respects.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the plaintiff limited his claims to certain articles. He testified that one of the articles, binoculars, had been in his possession 6 years prior to his immigrating to this country and that the remaining articles had been in his household for more than a year prior to departure. However, from the evidence presented the court was unable to determine which of the household effects, if any, are entitled to free entry under paragraph 1632. /The binoculars were not shown to be household effects, nor to be exempt from duty under paragraph 1798. On the record presented the protest was overruled in all respects.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Cust. Ct. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-44218-k-of-nathan-cusc-1942.