Protest 44127-K of Sun Wing Wo Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 44127-K of Sun Wing Wo Co.

11 Cust. Ct. 248

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 1, 1943

DocketNo. 48704

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Cust. Ct. 248 (Protest 44127-K of Sun Wing Wo Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 44127-K of Sun Wing Wo Co., 11 Cust. Ct. 248 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial the examiner testified in behalf of the plaintiff and identified two samples which were received in evidence. The chief chemist at San Francisco was later called on behalf of the plaintiff and testified that the broken rice was 2%o percent of the samples, which conclusion he arrived at through the method used by the Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Seed and Grain Investigation, and also by all laboratories in the customs service, and with an instrument called the Boerner sampler. On the record presented it was found that the broken rice was 2%> percent of the shipment here involved and it [249]*249was therefore held that such percentage of rice is dutiable at of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 727 and T. D. 48075 as claimed. United States v. Brandenstein (17 C. C. P. A. 480, T. D. 43941) and United States v. Great Pacific Co. (23 id. 319, T. D. 48192) cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial the examiner testified in behalf of the plaintiff and identified two samples which were received in evidence. The chief chemist at San Francisco was later called on behalf of the plaintiff and testified that the broken rice was 2%o percent of the samples, which conclusion he arrived at through the method used by the Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Seed and Grain Investigation, and also by all laboratories in the customs service, and with an instrument called the Boerner sampler. On the record presented it was found that the broken rice was 2%> percent of the shipment here involved and it [249]*249was therefore held that such percentage of rice is dutiable at of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 727 and T. D. 48075 as claimed. United States v. Brandenstein (17 C. C. P. A. 480, T. D. 43941) and United States v. Great Pacific Co. (23 id. 319, T. D. 48192) cited.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Cust. Ct. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-44127-k-of-sun-wing-wo-co-cusc-1943.