Protest 42695-G of Stern Bros.
This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 357 (Protest 42695-G of Stern Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Amrein v. United States (T. D. 49551) the Normandy laces in question were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed. Cushions and other embroidered articles similar to those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) were held dutiable at the same rate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Cust. Ct. 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-42695-g-of-stern-bros-cusc-1939.