Protest 37003-K of Enbun Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 37003-K of Enbun Co.

8 Cust. Ct. 480

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 2, 1942

DocketNo. 47026

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Cust. Ct. 480 (Protest 37003-K of Enbun Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 37003-K of Enbun Co., 8 Cust. Ct. 480 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial a package of “Cutted Dry Bonita” was presented to be analyzed by a Government chemist. The report shows that the sample contains no added flavoring materials or preservatives other than salt, and that the amount of salt is in excess of that normally present in dried unsalted fish. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question is of the same character and description as that the subject of United States v. Enbun (19 C. C. P. A. 79, T. D. 45224) the claim at 1)4 cents; per pound under paragraph 717 (c) was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial a package of “Cutted Dry Bonita” was presented to be analyzed by a Government chemist. The report shows that the sample contains no added flavoring materials or preservatives other than salt, and that the amount of salt is in excess of that normally present in dried unsalted fish. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question is of the same character and description as that the subject of United States v. Enbun (19 C. C. P. A. 79, T. D. 45224) the claim at 1)4 cents; per pound under paragraph 717 (c) was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Cust. Ct. 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-37003-k-of-enbun-co-cusc-1942.