Protest 36757-K/89500 of W. Braun Co.
This text of 8 Cust. Ct. 507 (Protest 36757-K/89500 of W. Braun Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
A bottle and unground stopper were received in evidence as exhibit 1. Appearing on the bottle were the words “Recher’s Muscatel.” The only witness in the ease, the general manager of the importing concern, testified, among other things, that the bottles filled with wine had been imported specifically for D. Recher & Co. as containers “for their port, sherry, and muscatel wines”; and that all of the bottles were of the same character and appearance excepting the descriptive lettering, some having the lettering “Recher’s Port” and “Recher’s Sherry.” He further testified that while all bottles could be used on the table, generally a bottle that is marked in a commercial manner such as this one is hardly suitable for that purpose. The court was of the opinion that the loose stopper in the instant ease does not render the bottle here involved unsuitable for holding wine, as testified to by the witness, whatever may be said of the unsuitability for transportation purposes. It was held that the uncon-tradicted testimony of this witness as to the use of the merchandise was sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification. It was therefore found that the bottles in question were not for table service but for the holding of wine. The claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 217 was therefore sustained. DeBoer v. United States (T. D. 44301) cited.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Cust. Ct. 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-36757-k89500-of-w-braun-co-cusc-1942.