Protest 3674-K of Gershgorn & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 3674-K of Gershgorn & Co.

8 Cust. Ct. 455

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 28, 1942

DocketNo. 46896

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Cust. Ct. 455 (Protest 3674-K of Gershgorn & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 3674-K of Gershgorn & Co., 8 Cust. Ct. 455 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that so-called watch bracelets are the same in all material respects as those the subject of Gershgorn v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 72, C. D. 429), except that they are prepared for the setting of precious or semiprecious stones, and in view of T. D. [456]*45648093, the watch bracelets in question were held dutiable at 40 cents each and 30 percent ad valorem under paragraph 367 (f) (3) as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that so-called watch bracelets are the same in all material respects as those the subject of Gershgorn v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 72, C. D. 429), except that they are prepared for the setting of precious or semiprecious stones, and in view of T. D. [456]*45648093, the watch bracelets in question were held dutiable at 40 cents each and 30 percent ad valorem under paragraph 367 (f) (3) as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Cust. Ct. 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-3674-k-of-gershgorn-co-cusc-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack