Protest 352803-G of Altman

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 352803-G of Altman

4 Cust. Ct. 363

United States Customs Court·Decided January 12, 1940·No. No. 43003·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: laces and lace articles like those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), filet laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy laces like those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 [364] id. 353, C. A. D. 40), and Alengon laces similar to the merchandise passed upon in United States v. Caesar (18 id. 106, T. D. 44067) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. On the authority of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 id. 149, T. D. 43473) artificial flowers were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: laces and lace articles like those the subject of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), filet laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Normandy laces like those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 [364] id. 353, C. A. D. 40), and Alengon laces similar to the merchandise passed upon in United States v. Caesar (18 id. 106, T. D. 44067) at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. On the authority of Robinson-Goodman v. United States (17 id. 149, T. D. 43473) artificial flowers were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.

Protest 352803-G of Altman, 4 Cust. Ct. 363 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 363 (Protest 352803-G of Altman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related