Protest 34862-K of Kirsch Bros.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 34862-K of Kirsch Bros.

8 Cust. Ct. 442

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1942

DocketNo. 46828

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Cust. Ct. 442 (Protest 34862-K of Kirsch Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 34862-K of Kirsch Bros., 8 Cust. Ct. 442 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with the reports of the chemist, together with the testimony of the exporter that the importer refused to accept all the fish in this lot because its moisture content was more than 43 percent, the court found that the fish in question contained more than 43 percent moisture. In accordance therewith the so-called “medium” codfish was held dutiable at three-fourths of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 719 (2) as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with the reports of the chemist, together with the testimony of the exporter that the importer refused to accept all the fish in this lot because its moisture content was more than 43 percent, the court found that the fish in question contained more than 43 percent moisture. In accordance therewith the so-called “medium” codfish was held dutiable at three-fourths of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 719 (2) as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Cust. Ct. 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-34862-k-of-kirsch-bros-cusc-1942.