Protest 34481-K of Elder

10 Cust. Ct. 369
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 11, 1943
DocketNo. 47894
StatusPublished

This text of 10 Cust. Ct. 369 (Protest 34481-K of Elder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protest 34481-K of Elder, 10 Cust. Ct. 369 (cusc 1943).

Opinion

Opinion by

Walker, J.

At the trial the importer testified, and one of the so-called kernels which the witness called a “nut” was received in evidence as exhibit 2. However, this witness displayed no qualifications to enable him to testify with authority that exhibit 2 is a nut, nor does it appear that he is a botanist or had any extensive learning or experience on the subject of nuts. No other witnesses were called. On the record presented, which was held insufficient to warrant a finding [370]*370that the oil in question has therapeutic or medicinal properties and is chiefly used for medicinal purposes, and no effort having been- made to prove that the oil in .question -was not edible, all claims in the protest were overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Cust. Ct. 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-34481-k-of-elder-cusc-1943.