Protest 34481-K of Elder
This text of 10 Cust. Ct. 369 (Protest 34481-K of Elder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
At the trial the importer testified, and one of the so-called kernels which the witness called a “nut” was received in evidence as exhibit 2. However, this witness displayed no qualifications to enable him to testify with authority that exhibit 2 is a nut, nor does it appear that he is a botanist or had any extensive learning or experience on the subject of nuts. No other witnesses were called. On the record presented, which was held insufficient to warrant a finding [370]*370that the oil in question has therapeutic or medicinal properties and is chiefly used for medicinal purposes, and no effort having been- made to prove that the oil in .question -was not edible, all claims in the protest were overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 Cust. Ct. 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-34481-k-of-elder-cusc-1943.