Protest 32644-K of Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 32644-K of Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc.

8 Cust. Ct. 520

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 15, 1942

DocketNo. 47194

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Cust. Ct. 520 (Protest 32644-K of Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 32644-K of Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc., 8 Cust. Ct. 520 (cusc 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the hearing three witnesses, including the examiner of merchandise, testified for the plaintiff. The merchandise was described by the witnesses as vases of plain white china embossed in the mold, having handles in ornamental forms such as a bird with wings, etc., and they stated that the.articles were regarded by the trade and dealt in as white blanks for ornamentation, and that the handles were utilitarian in purpose. In view of the uncontradicted evidence the vases in question were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 212 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the hearing three witnesses, including the examiner of merchandise, testified for the plaintiff. The merchandise was described by the witnesses as vases of plain white china embossed in the mold, having handles in ornamental forms such as a bird with wings, etc., and they stated that the.articles were regarded by the trade and dealt in as white blanks for ornamentation, and that the handles were utilitarian in purpose. In view of the uncontradicted evidence the vases in question were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 212 as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 Cust. Ct. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-32644-k-of-marks-rosenfeld-inc-cusc-1942.