Protest 317727-G of J. E. Bernard & Co.
4 Cust. Ct. 507
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), and Abstract 39456 the atomizers, droppers, and boxes in question were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 317727-G of J. E. Bernard & Co., 4 Cust. Ct. 507 (cusc 1940).
4 Cust. Ct. 507 (Protest 317727-G of J. E. Bernard & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.