Protest 306764-G of Saks & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 306764-G of Saks & Co.

3 Cust. Ct. 363

United States Customs Court·Decided August 28, 1939·No. No. 42006·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel atomizers, trays, bookends, bottles, boxes, and flaeons chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id 282, T. D. 46816), Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), and Abstract 39787 cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel atomizers, trays, bookends, bottles, boxes, and flaeons chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id 282, T. D. 46816), Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), and Abstract 39787 cited.

Protest 306764-G of Saks & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 363 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 363 (Protest 306764-G of Saks & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.