Protest 30036-K of Fung Chong

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 30036-K of Fung Chong

11 Cust. Ct. 226

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 28, 1943

DocketNo. 48599

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Cust. Ct. 226 (Protest 30036-K of Fung Chong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 30036-K of Fung Chong, 11 Cust. Ct. 226 (cusc 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated by counsel that the Chinese medicinal wines in question are the same in all material respects as those involved in Wing Duck Co. v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 133, C. D. 446), which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith it was held that the internal revenue tax was not applicable to the merchandise as set forth in the stipulation. The protest was therefore sustained to that extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated by counsel that the Chinese medicinal wines in question are the same in all material respects as those involved in Wing Duck Co. v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 133, C. D. 446), which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith it was held that the internal revenue tax was not applicable to the merchandise as set forth in the stipulation. The protest was therefore sustained to that extent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Cust. Ct. 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-30036-k-of-fung-chong-cusc-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack