Protest 279200-G of Saks

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 279200-G of Saks

2 Cust. Ct. 722

United States Customs Court·Decided May 26, 1939·No. No. 41427·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In, accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) boxes and atomizers chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes and hollow flacons and boxes at 40 percent under paragraph 339; (2) brushes similar to those the subject of Abstract 8950 at 45 percent under paragraph 1407; and (3) mirrors at 50 percent under paragraph 230. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), and Viking Trading Co. v. United States (C. D. 132) cited.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In, accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) boxes and atomizers chiefly used in the household for utilitarian purposes and hollow flacons and boxes at 40 percent under paragraph 339; (2) brushes similar to those the subject of Abstract 8950 at 45 percent under paragraph 1407; and (3) mirrors at 50 percent under paragraph 230. United States v. Friedlaender (21 C. C. P. A. 103, T. D. 46445), Dow v. United States (id. 282, T. D. 46816), Rice v. United States (T. D. 49373), and Viking Trading Co. v. United States (C. D. 132) cited.'

Protest 279200-G of Saks, 2 Cust. Ct. 722 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 722 (Protest 279200-G of Saks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.