Protest 259231-G of Zendman

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 259231-G of Zendman

2 Cust. Ct. 554

United States Customs Court·Decided January 23, 1939·No. No. 40500·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel fabrics or articles in chief value of silk the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31. On the authority of United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809) flouneings, trimmings, allovers, galloons, and insertings composed of net and embroidered were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel fabrics or articles in chief value of silk the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31. On the authority of United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809) flouneings, trimmings, allovers, galloons, and insertings composed of net and embroidered were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.

Protest 259231-G of Zendman, 2 Cust. Ct. 554 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 554 (Protest 259231-G of Zendman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.