Protest 25325-K of Tuck High & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 25325-K of Tuck High & Co.

16 Cust. Ct. 230

United States Customs Court·Decided July 1, 1946·No. No. 50912·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

At the trial a Government chemist testified that he found the sample to be composed of a synthetic phenolic resin, colored with a small amount of white pigment, and that in his opinion the synthetic phenolic resin was not a binding agent in the article. The case was submitted for decision, counsel for the plaintiff citing Abstract 49907. Following Abstract 50728, it was held that the merchandise is properly dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

At the trial a Government chemist testified that he found the sample to be composed of a synthetic phenolic resin, colored with a small amount of white pigment, and that in his opinion the synthetic phenolic resin was not a binding agent in the article. The case was submitted for decision, counsel for the plaintiff citing Abstract 49907. Following Abstract 50728, it was held that the merchandise is properly dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.

Protest 25325-K of Tuck High & Co., 16 Cust. Ct. 230 (cusc 1946).

Pincite

16 Cust. Ct. 230 (Protest 25325-K of Tuck High & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related