Protest 22092-K of Ti Hang Lung
7 Cust. Ct. 274
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the items are similar to the merchandise passed upon in Wing Duck v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 133, C. D. 446), and Columbia Co. v. United States (5 id. 175, C. D. 395) it was found that the Liquor Taxing Act of 1934 is not applicable thereto. The protest was therefore sustained as to the items in question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 22092-K of Ti Hang Lung, 7 Cust. Ct. 274 (cusc 1941).
7 Cust. Ct. 274 (Protest 22092-K of Ti Hang Lung) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wing Duck Co. v. United States
6 Cust. Ct. 133 (U.S. Customs Court, 1941)