Protest 183830-G of I. Magnin Co.
4 Cust. Ct. 417
This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 417 (Protest 183830-G of I. Magnin Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Protest 183830-G of I. Magnin Co., 4 Cust. Ct. 417 (cusc 1940).
Opinion
[418]*418Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) and United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) embroidered wearing apparel and Normandy lace were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pustet v. United States
13 Ct. Cust. 530 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Cust. Ct. 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-183830-g-of-i-magnin-co-cusc-1940.