Protest 171078-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 171078-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

3 Cust. Ct. 367

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedAugust 30, 1939

DocketNo. 42029

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 367 (Protest 171078-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 171078-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 367 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) and Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) Normandy laces and embroidered articles were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments the same as those the subject of Abstract 37230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) and Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) Normandy laces and embroidered articles were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments the same as those the subject of Abstract 37230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Cust. Ct. 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-171078-g-of-r-h-macy-co-cusc-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack