Protest 171078-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 171078-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

3 Cust. Ct. 367

United States Customs Court·Decided August 30, 1939·No. No. 42029·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) and Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) Normandy laces and embroidered articles were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments the same as those the subject of Abstract 37230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) and Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396) Normandy laces and embroidered articles were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments the same as those the subject of Abstract 37230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31.

Protest 171078-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 367 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 367 (Protest 171078-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related