Protest 16149-K of Charles Happel, Inc.
4 Cust. Ct. 442
This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 442 (Protest 16149-K of Charles Happel, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Protest 16149-K of Charles Happel, Inc., 4 Cust. Ct. 442 (cusc 1940).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Oppleman v. United States (3 Cust. Ct. 167, C. D. 225) aneroid barometers were held dutiable at 27% percent under paragraph 372 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
L. Oppleman, Inc. v. United States
3 Cust. Ct. 167 (U.S. Customs Court, 1939)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Cust. Ct. 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-16149-k-of-charles-happel-inc-cusc-1940.