Protest 154358-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 154358-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

3 Cust. Ct. 366

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedAugust 30, 1939

DocketNo. 42028

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 366 (Protest 154358-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 154358-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 366 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), and United States v. Smith (12 id. 384, T. D. 40544) Normandy laces, embroidered motives, embroidered dress in part of lace, pillow slips embroidered and in part of lace, and embroidered trimmings were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), and United States v. Smith (12 id. 384, T. D. 40544) Normandy laces, embroidered motives, embroidered dress in part of lace, pillow slips embroidered and in part of lace, and embroidered trimmings were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Cust. Ct. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-154358-g-of-r-h-macy-co-cusc-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack