Protest 154358-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 154358-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

3 Cust. Ct. 366

United States Customs Court·Decided August 30, 1939·No. No. 42028·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), and United States v. Smith (12 id. 384, T. D. 40544) Normandy laces, embroidered motives, embroidered dress in part of lace, pillow slips embroidered and in part of lace, and embroidered trimmings were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), Pustet v. United States (13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 530, T. D. 41396), and United States v. Smith (12 id. 384, T. D. 40544) Normandy laces, embroidered motives, embroidered dress in part of lace, pillow slips embroidered and in part of lace, and embroidered trimmings were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Protest 154358-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 366 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 366 (Protest 154358-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related