Protest 15159-K of Bailey Green & Eiger, Inc.

8 Cust. Ct. 511
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMay 6, 1942
DocketNo. 47149
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 8 Cust. Ct. 511 (Protest 15159-K of Bailey Green & Eiger, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protest 15159-K of Bailey Green & Eiger, Inc., 8 Cust. Ct. 511 (cusc 1942).

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Two samples were received in evidence. The buyer of the importing firm testified, among other things, that these buttons are used for buttoning women’s coats and skirts and that he knew of no other use. The examiner at the port of New York testified in behalf of the defendant that he had advisorily classified the merchandise under paragraph 1527. He also testified that exhibit 2 was cast metal and silver-plated, but was unable to state definitely as to exhibit 1 whether it was gold-plated stating that the metal looked like brass. The Government conceded that the merchandise consists of metal buttons embossed with a design, device, pattern, or lettering. From the record presented and in view of United States v. Gaunt (T. D. 41784) the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 349 and T. D. 49458 was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey Green & Elger, Inc. v. United States
28 Cust. Ct. 253 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)
B. Blumenthal & Co. v. United States
26 Cust. Ct. 1 (U.S. Customs Court, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Cust. Ct. 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-15159-k-of-bailey-green-eiger-inc-cusc-1942.