Protest 13228-K/88799 of International Import Co.
6 Cust. Ct. 534
Opinion
[535]*535Opinion by
Prom the testimony it appeared that this onyx is not in block-norm as that term is commonly understood. It was found to be pieces broken off blocks in the process of shaping. Vermont Marble Co. v. United States (G. A. 4747, T. D. 22434), Fisher v. United States (G. A. 5425, T. D. 24683), and Charles Mill Supply Co. v. United States (G. A. 5312, T. D. 24325) distinguished. Since onyx is a mineral it was held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 214 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 13228-K/88799 of International Import Co., 6 Cust. Ct. 534 (cusc 1941).
6 Cust. Ct. 534 (Protest 13228-K/88799 of International Import Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.