Protest 12951-K of Bieber
This text of 14 Cust. Ct. 238 (Protest 12951-K of Bieber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
At the trial both of defendant’s witnesses admitted that the merchandise is a candlestick designed for electrical illumination-but maintained it is also a lamp base because it is drilled for wiring. Plaintiff conceded that all candlesticks designed for electrical illumination might be described as lamp bases, but contended that that would not exclude them from the more specific description of candlesticks designed for electrical illumination. Upon consideration of the testimony and an examination of exhibit 1 the merchandise was held properly dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 218 (c), as modified. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Cust. Ct. 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-12951-k-of-bieber-cusc-1945.