Protest 121188-K of Britam Agencies

18 Cust. Ct. 185
United States Customs Court·Decided April 18, 1947·No. No. 51670·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Inasmuch as no evidence was introduced at the trial to establish whether or not there had been a short-landing of the 26 raincoats, it was held that the affidavits submitted to the collector for the sole purpose of establishing that the regulations were complied with, were insufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s action. Borgfeldt v. United States (11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 421, T. D. 39433) and Altman v. United States (13 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 868) cited. The protest was therefore overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protest 121188-K of Britam Agencies, 18 Cust. Ct. 185 (cusc 1947).

18 Cust. Ct. 185 (Protest 121188-K of Britam Agencies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United States
20 Cust. Ct. 49 (U.S. Customs Court, 1948)