Protest 114833-K of Siegfried Loewenthal Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 114833-K of Siegfried Loewenthal Co.

18 Cust. Ct. 193

United States Customs Court·Decided May 8, 1947·No. No. 51701·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Eicwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Somerset (33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328), and that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the total contents of barrels numbered 23, 54, 55, 58, and 63, was lost in transit from the port of exportation to the port of destination due to breakage, leakage, or damage. In accordance therewith it was held that an [194]*194allowance should have been made for the loss appearing upon the gauger’s return as- verified by the affidavit of the importer. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Eicwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Somerset (33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328), and that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the total contents of barrels numbered 23, 54, 55, 58, and 63, was lost in transit from the port of exportation to the port of destination due to breakage, leakage, or damage. In accordance therewith it was held that an [194]*194allowance should have been made for the loss appearing upon the gauger’s return as- verified by the affidavit of the importer. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Protest 114833-K of Siegfried Loewenthal Co., 18 Cust. Ct. 193 (cusc 1947).

Pincite

18 Cust. Ct. 193 (Protest 114833-K of Siegfried Loewenthal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.