Protest 110877-K of Danzig

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 110877-K of Danzig

13 Cust. Ct. 296

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 18, 1944

DocketNo. 49762

StatusPublished

This text of 13 Cust. Ct. 296 (Protest 110877-K of Danzig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 110877-K of Danzig, 13 Cust. Ct. 296 (cusc 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was agreed by counsel that certain items consist of hemp hats," not blocked or trimmed, and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, similar to those involved in United States v. Armand Schwab (30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), which record was admitted in evidence. t In accordance therewith the court held the items in question to be dutiable at only 25 percent ad valorem as. claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was agreed by counsel that certain items consist of hemp hats," not blocked or trimmed, and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, similar to those involved in United States v. Armand Schwab (30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), which record was admitted in evidence. t In accordance therewith the court held the items in question to be dutiable at only 25 percent ad valorem as. claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 Cust. Ct. 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-110877-k-of-danzig-cusc-1944.