Protest 107238-K of Maryland Distillers Products Co.

16 Cust. Ct. 237
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 7, 1946
DocketNo. 50935
StatusPublished

This text of 16 Cust. Ct. 237 (Protest 107238-K of Maryland Distillers Products Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protest 107238-K of Maryland Distillers Products Co., 16 Cust. Ct. 237 (cusc 1946).

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The sole question before the court was whether these glass containers are bottles or demijohns within the meaning of those terms as used in the tariff act, there being no proof of a commercial meaning differing from the common meaning. It was held that the containers in question, having straight sides and a fiat bottom, not being enclosed in wickerwork and having no handles, are not demijohns as that term is defined in the dictionaries and as described by the court in United States v. Ninety Demijohns of Rum (8 Fed. 485, 487). On the record it was found that the glass containers are bottles and, as such, properly dutiable at one-sixth of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 217, by virtue of paragraph 810, and T. D. 50797.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ninety Demijohns of Rum
8 F. 485 (United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of Florida, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Cust. Ct. 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-107238-k-of-maryland-distillers-products-co-cusc-1946.