Protest 107238-K of Maryland Distillers Products Co.

16 Cust. Ct. 237
United States Customs Court·Decided March 7, 1946·No. No. 50935·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The sole question before the court was whether these glass containers are bottles or demijohns within the meaning of those terms as used in the tariff act, there being no proof of a commercial meaning differing from the common meaning. It was held that the containers in question, having straight sides and a fiat bottom, not being enclosed in wickerwork and having no handles, are not demijohns as that term is defined in the dictionaries and as described by the court in United States v. Ninety Demijohns of Rum (8 Fed. 485, 487). On the record it was found that the glass containers are bottles and, as such, properly dutiable at one-sixth of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 217, by virtue of paragraph 810, and T. D. 50797.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Protest 107238-K of Maryland Distillers Products Co., 16 Cust. Ct. 237 (cusc 1946).

16 Cust. Ct. 237 (Protest 107238-K of Maryland Distillers Products Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ninety Demijohns of Rum
8 F. 485 (United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of Florida, 1880)