Protest 106783-K of Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc.
This text of 15 Cust. Ct. 285 (Protest 106783-K of Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
It was held that as the French Trade Agreement specifically provides for duty on parts, such rate must prevail, even though the later British Trade Agreement provides for a lower rate of duty on cigar and cigarette lighters, since no modification of the rates of duty on parts was made in the said British Trade Agreement. In the absence of a specific provision therefor, parts of an article will not be included within an eo nomine designation of the article itself (Murphy & Co. v. United States, 13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 256, T. D. 41201). The protest was overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 Cust. Ct. 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-106783-k-of-alfred-dunhill-of-london-inc-cusc-1945.