Protest 10616-K of Anco Import Corp.
7 Cust. Ct. 294
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the items consist of spangles slung, similar to those involved in Fashion Trimming Cory. v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 462), the claim at 60 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1503 was sustained, holding the merchandise in ques[295]*295tion dutiable as “articles not ornamented with beads, spangles, or bugles, not embroidered, tamboured, appliqued, or scalloped, composed wholly or in chief value of spangles.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 10616-K of Anco Import Corp., 7 Cust. Ct. 294 (cusc 1941).
7 Cust. Ct. 294 (Protest 10616-K of Anco Import Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fashion Trimming Corp. v. United States
6 Cust. Ct. 199 (U.S. Customs Court, 1941)