Protest 10616-K of Anco Import Corp.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 10616-K of Anco Import Corp.

7 Cust. Ct. 294

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1941

DocketNo. 46449

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Cust. Ct. 294 (Protest 10616-K of Anco Import Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 10616-K of Anco Import Corp., 7 Cust. Ct. 294 (cusc 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the items consist of spangles slung, similar to those involved in Fashion Trimming Cory. v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 462), the claim at 60 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1503 was sustained, holding the merchandise in ques[295]*295tion dutiable as “articles not ornamented with beads, spangles, or bugles, not embroidered, tamboured, appliqued, or scalloped, composed wholly or in chief value of spangles.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the items consist of spangles slung, similar to those involved in Fashion Trimming Cory. v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 462), the claim at 60 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1503 was sustained, holding the merchandise in ques[295]*295tion dutiable as “articles not ornamented with beads, spangles, or bugles, not embroidered, tamboured, appliqued, or scalloped, composed wholly or in chief value of spangles.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Cust. Ct. 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-10616-k-of-anco-import-corp-cusc-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack