Protest 10585-K of Puttmann
4 Cust. Ct. 502
Opinion
Opinion by
The record showed that the rolls of paper were themselves wrapped in paper and were packed in wooden cases and that the cases were marked “Made in Belgium,” but that no marking appeared on either the paper or the paper wrappers. It was found that the paper wrappers were the immediate containers of the paper and that neither the paper nor the immediate containers were legally marked. The protest was therefore overruled following International Forwarding Co. v. United States (3 Cust. Ct. 314, C. D. 266).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protest 10585-K of Puttmann, 4 Cust. Ct. 502 (cusc 1940).
4 Cust. Ct. 502 (Protest 10585-K of Puttmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
International Forwarding Co. v. United States
3 Cust. Ct. 314 (U.S. Customs Court, 1939)