Protest 105406-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 105406-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

3 Cust. Ct. 361

United States Customs Court·Decided August 25, 1939·No. No. 41993·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United Slates v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) and United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809) Normandy laces, embroidered cotton curtains, and embroidered silk veilings were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those the subject of Abstract 38230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United Slates v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) and United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809) Normandy laces, embroidered cotton curtains, and embroidered silk veilings were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments similar to those the subject of Abstract 38230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31.

Protest 105406-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 361 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 361 (Protest 105406-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.